HomePoliticsU.S. Supreme Court Upholds Trump’s Travel Ban Politics U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Trump’s Travel Ban June 26, 2018 In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the President’s 3rd version of his controversial travel ban from mostly Muslim countries. Chief Justice John Roberts, who authored the conservative majority opinion, wrote that the order was “squarely within the scope of presidential authority” under federal law. “The sole prerequisite set forth in [federal law] is that the president find that the entry of the covered aliens would be detrimental to the interests of the United States. The president has undoubtedly fulfilled that requirement here,” he wrote. Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor was among the court’s four liberals that wrote a dissent. “This repackaging does little to cleanse [the policy] of the appearance of discrimination that the president’s words have created,” she said. “Based on the evidence in the record, a reasonable observer would conclude that the proclamation was motivated by anti-Muslim animus.” While the policy was upheld, the case was sent back to the lower courts, which were told to rely on the Supreme Court’s interpretation of executive authority. It was the first significant legal test so far of Trump’s policies and power and could lead to a precedent-setting expansion on the limits of presidential power, especially within the immigration context. Federal appeals courts in Virginia and California in recent months had ruled against the administration. The San Francisco-based 9th Circuit Court last December concluded Trump’s proclamation, like the two previous executive orders, overstepped his powers to regulate the entry of aliens. But the justices had allowed the current restrictions to be enforced at the Justice Department’s request, at least until the case was fully litigated. The Trump administration also seemed to enjoy a favorable reception before the court during arguments in April. Associate Justice Samuel Alito, during those April arguments, noted that of the 50 or so mostly Muslim majority countries, only five were on the current banned list, or about 8 percent of the population, he said. The White House had framed the issue as a temporary move involving national security. Sixteen state leaders led by Texas were among a number of coalitions backing the Trump administration. But Hawaii officials, who filed the appeal contesting all of the president’s orders, said the president’s policies violate the Constitution’s guarantee of religious freedom: “Any reasonable observer who heard the president’s campaign promises, read his thinly justified orders banning overwhelmingly Muslim populations, and observed his administration’s persistent statements linking the two, would view the order and each of its precursors as the fulfillment of the president’s promise to prohibit Muslim immigration to the United States.” A coalition of groups in opposition called the order blatant religious discrimination, since the countries involved have mostly Muslim populations: Iran, Libya, Sudan, Syria and Yemen. Chad was recently removed from the list after the administration said that country had beefed up its information-sharing. As reported by the AP. President Trump’s administration has laid out a course of action that countries need to follow if they want to be removed from the travel ban, including providing U.S. authorities with access to data bases about foreign aliens who wish to enter the U.S. So far Iraq and Sudan have been removed from the travel ban list after complying with Trump’s new rules.